|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 
Ground
Effect is the most
efficient mode of powered
flight yet known to man. In nature sea birds such as the Albatross
extend their flight range to incredible distances across the oceans.
When an appropriately designed
aerodynamic
wing is flying close to water or ground, the
aerodynamic lift increases due to the creation of a
dynamic air cushion under the wing. Birds and man-made machines that
fly in this
region are said to be operating in the region of ground effect. A considerable
advantage of economy of energy can be achieved flying in ground effect.
An airborne craft that is designed to operate in this region
immediately above the water or terrain is said to be a ground effect vehicle or a WIG
(wing in ground) vehicle.
The
Wright brothers used ground effect when they flew their first aeroplane
in 1903. In fact it took them a further six years to
design a wing shape and find a lightweight propulsion system with
enough power to lift them out of ground effect. The wing-in-ground
effect technology works well with three
well-known but surprisingly little appreciated principles of
aerodynamics:
Firstly, the aerodynamic efficiency and lifting capacity of a wing
increases dramatically when operated in less than one-half of its wing
span above water or ground, in what is termed "ground effect". Ground
effect is the phenomenon caused by the presence of a boundary between
the ground surface and the wing, which aletrs the flow of air stream
around the wing and restricts the down-wash off the top of the wing.
This down-wash is normally responsible for creating considerable
"induced drag" when it mixes and eddies with the air that has passed
under the wing. In ground effect, the air that has passed under the
wing is far more compressed and is generally less turbulent than when
the wing is in free flight. This allows much more efficient mixing with
the top surface airflow at the trailing edge of the wing. When an
appropriately designed wing is operated very close to a surface, lift
is increased by as much as 45% and drag is decreased by up to 70% as
compared to the same wing operating in free flight. Typically, an
aircraft at normal flight attitudes will carry around 5 kg/kw of engine
power. A well designed ground effect craft will carry up to 20 kg/kw of
engine power, ie, 400% increase in power to weight efficiency over
conventional aircraft. The efficiency of a ground effect craft
increases with size. A 2 tonne 4 seat ground effect craft, while still
more efficient than a similar light aircraft is nowhere near as
efficient as a 50 or a 500 tonne ground effect craft.
Secondly,
the Coanda effect, also known
as "boundary layer attachment", is the tendency of a stream of fluid to
stay attached to a convex surface, rather than follow a straight line
in its original direction. The Coanda effect has important applications
in various lift-enhancing devices on aircraft, where air moving over
the wing can be "bent down" towards the ground using flaps and a jet
blowing over a curved surface to increase the lift.
Thirdly, the lifting
capacity of the wing is increased if the airstream over the wing is
accelerated by the high-velocity exhaust engine. Therefore by a
combination of deflected engine thrust, traditional
aerodynamic lift and augmented propulsive lift, it is possible to make
a more efficient ground effect flight.
The history of man taking advantage of ground effect with conventional
aircrafts dates back to World War II when German aviators flying the
Europe-South American route found that as much as fifty percent of
their fuel could be saved if they trimmed their craft to fly just above
the sea's surface, thus extending their bomber's operational range
further into the European theatre as the conflict developed. However,
the aircraft is designed to fly most
efficiently at high speed and at high altitude. It is not purpose
designed to operate efficiently in the region of ground effect. A
considerable amount of research and development work has been carried
out since the end of World War II in an effort to produce a stable,
purpose-built ground effect vehicle to establish commercial design
criteria for high
efficiency operation primarily in the marine ground effect
environments. This work
is still continuing mainly in Russia, Germany, China, Korea and
Singapore.
|
 |
A
Brief History
of Ground Effect Development

Wing-in-ground (WIG) effect have been actively researched and
developed since the early 1960's despite the fact that in that period
these crafts have not reached the acceptance level as mainstream
transport vehicles for either civilian or military applications. Two
main streams of R&D in WIG crafts
originated from the former Soviet Union and the Germany. The nett result has been the
emergence of two fundamental wing shapes, the "square planform" and the
reverse delta triangular "Lippisch" type. The former’s
school is known as the Erkranoplane and the Soviets
dominated this
school. The
German
school is named after Dr Alexander
Martin Lippisch (1894 - 1976).
Dr
Alexander
Martin Lippisch was born on 2 November 1894 in Munich, Bavaria,
Germany, the son of Franz and Clara (Commichau) Lippisch. His father
was an artist. Alexander was educated at the Technische Hochschule
Berlin, Germany. He enlisted in Germany's armed forces in 1915, and
served until 1918 as an aerial photographer. He was awarded a doctoral
degree at the University of Heidelberg at the age of 50 in 1943. Dr
Lippisch was the
inventor of the forward
delta wing and tailless aircraft, which finally led to the first rocket
engine driven aircraft. It
was the well known Me-163 used during the end of World War II as
interceptor aircraft by the German Air Force.
Dr Lippisch intended to fill out the gap of transportation
existing
particularly in countries with many water regions of lakes and rivers,
or countries with sea shores and where no expensive airports can be
built. Though most ships and modern aircrafts are catered for
mass goods transportation, they are however slow and expensive
respectively. To counter this situation, a proposed idea by a line of
dedicated designers gathered to construct high speed ships such as
the hydrofoils boats. High waves, however limits the efficiency of
hydrofoils whenever met the cruising limit of approximately 60 knots.
Another solution was to use the hovercraft. The hovercraft,
however, needed two engines,
namely one to produce the air cushion and a second one to give the
vehicle its horizontal speed. In addition, they are limited in flight
altitude and have only a small maneuverability.
Dr
Lippisch pioneered the reverse delta wing design for the ground effect
crafts. He designed a revolutionary new ground effect craft, the X-112.
It had a reverse
delta-wing planform with negative dihedral at the leading edge and a
large T-shaped tail, for stability. This configuration proved to be
inherently stable in ground effect flight and many recent designs have
been
based on the original Lippisch concept. Dr Lippisch named his reverse delta wing
ground effect craft as Aerofoilboat.
With his design, the aerofoilboat
stays
nearly as economical as a ship is, to be maneuverable like a ship but
as fast as an aircraft. The aerofoilboat
does not need an engine to produce an air
cushion, but only a propulsion to provide a forward thrust to get the
air speed. The aerofoilboat's reverse delta wing design is capable of
producing a ram
aerodynamically in short distance over the water. The air cushion
produced in this way amends the flight quality of the craft to an
astonishing extent. Alexander
Martin Lippisch died on 11 February 1976 in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, of a
heart and lung Ailment.
Ekranoplan
Vs AirFish
In sharp contrast with the design of the AirFish reverse delta wing planform, the
Ekranoplan type ground effect vessels are all square planform vessels. Changes
to the fore and aft pitch of this type of ground effect crafts is
damped at the
trailing edge, through the air under the wing's resistance to further
compression between the craft and the water surface. In the case of the
Ekranoplan square planform design, this line of "compressive stability"
runs across the craft in a straight line, and puts a critical stability
control point into the fore and aft moment. This must be carefully
controlled by the trail plane and elevator, much like flying balanced
on a see-saw.
The situation in a Lippisch's reverse delta wing planform is quite
different. The trailing edges of both wings extend from the rear of the
craft and pass the craft's center of gravity to the front. The critical
stability line is not
across the craft but at a tangent to it. This makes the fore and aft
pitch stability much more forgiving. This in turn reduces the pilot
skill demands, and also allows stretching the overall performance
envelope to include kinetic jumps. Not so with the Ekranoplan square
planform.
The highest efficiency on record for a square planform, power assisted
ram vessel is around 10 kg/kw. For a Lippisch reverse delta planform
this figure is
as high as 20 kg/kw. But more importantly from an operational point of
view, the most efficient surface clearance height of square planforms
are around only 10% of the wing span or less. On the contrary, a
Lippisch type ground effect
craft has surface clearance of up to 50% of the wing span. These
performance limitations will always relegate the Ekranoplan type
vessels to sheltered waters and rivers.
From
Aerofoilboat to AirFish
Dr
Lippisch’s design has evolved
into AirFish family of ground effect crafts which are the most
efficient form of
transports available today. Rhein Flugzeugbau
GmbH (RFB) pioneered the
German concept in Germany since 1964. Dr. Alexandria M. Lippisch was
then under employment of German scientific institutes and as a
consultant of
RFB. Together with
his
protégé Mr Hanno
Fischer, they
championed the design and
construction of several well known ground effect crafts such as the
experimental crafts X-113, X-114 and X-114H (X-114 with hydrofoils). These WIG crafts were built to military
specifications and requirements and are capable of free flight in
addition to
flight in ground effect operation. The
X-114 operating in
ground effect still hold the world record of having the highest
lift-to-drag ratio of any subsonic aircraft.
Ing. Hanno Fischer has developed around 12 different types of aircrafts
like the Fantrainer, Fanliner, RW 3 and the military used WIGs X113,
X114 and X-114H. After leaving RFB, Mr Hanno Fischer founded his own
research company, Fischer
Flugmechanik, where he focussed on the development of commercial
WIGs
without free flight capability for the civil passengers transportation market. Mr
Hanno Fischer and his protégé Mr Klaus Matjasic designed
and built the AirFish family
of WIGs, including AirFish-1,
AirFish-2
and AirFish-3, based on his
experience with Dr Lippisch. As a last resort, these crafts are
also capable to perform short jumps to avoid obstacles while cruising
in ground effect. These are the predecessor of the AirFish-8, an 8-seater WIG craft
that
is of
our current focus.
Subsequently,
WigetWorks acquired all patents, industrial property rights and
know-hows from the Airfoil Development GmbH and Fischer
Flugmechanik, covering the complete technology developed in connection
with the design, testing and manufacturing of all AirFish types of WIG
crafts. Wigetworks will continue the development and
commercial production of WIG crafts on the basis of AirFish
Technology and with the continuing support of the German designers. The
technology acquisition would grant WigetWorks worldwide exclusive
rights and license, with the rights to grant sub-licenses and to sell
and
distribute the AirFish Technology.
Enormous Potential of WIGs
A large number of hard facts underlie the
huge potential of WIGs, and the corresponding enormous opportunities
for WigetWorks:
Three
quarters of the world are covered by water and most major population
centers around the world are next to the ocean. Commuter traffics in
all forms have been on the increase, and will become more so as
globalization prevails. Few commuters travel by ships these days for
other than recreation purposes because it is slow and often
uncomfortable. The
world tourism industry is slowly trending away from traditional
cultural and historical sites and turning towards obscure tropical
islands like the Maldives and hard-to-reach remote places like the
Alaskan coast. These places are usually accessible only by boats which
take a long time, and have little or no transport infrastructures. There
is also a lack of transport infrastructures, in particular, airports
and seaports, in many third world countries, and also in first word
countries with relatively few population centers, such as Australia and
Canada. Major transport infrastructures like airports and seaports have
become increasingly congested. Airports and seaports are expensive to
build and maintain.
The
fastest ships are wave piercing catamarans and the top speed threshold
for all marine crafts appears to be stubbornly stuck at about 50~60
knots
for several decades now. At its top speed, the fuel consumption of a
ship or catamaran is many times more than when it is traveling at its
efficient cruising speed. Obviously hydrodynamic drag will always be
present as long as the hull is in contact with water. Consequently the
most efficient marine craft is clearly one that is not in contact with
water. This is the motivation of hovercrafts and hydrofoils, even
though both of these still cannot avoid contact with the water. The
most exciting innovation that came out of the marine transport industry
in the last 100 years seems to be the Hovercraft. But this is more than
40 years old. This technology turns out to be disappointing in terms of
its high cost and poor maintainability.
There
is an obvious lack of viable transport over the water, other than
expensive helicopters in the speed range of 50 knots to 100 knots. A
typical small aircraft such as Vanilla Cessna 152, cruises at about 100
knots. It is uneconomical and unsafe for aircrafts to fly at speed
below 100 knots.
While
air-travel is statistically the safest mode of transportation, a few
known crashes often strike deep fear into the psyche of commuters.
Recent waves of terrorism have significantly threatened the safety of
air-travel, and many would probably be glad to give air-travel up if
not because it saves them time. There
is a lot of unproductive down-time associated with air-travel, for
example, the need to check in at the airport 2 hours before take-off,
waiting to collect luggage at the congested carousel after landing.
Furthermore, most airports are far away from the commercial centers or
tourist destinations hence further commuting by roads or by slow boats
is often necessary, adding to further journey fatigue.
 Construction
of aircrafts is subjected to very
stringent FAA requirements resulting in
their high costs.
The world appears to go through one energy crisis after another. The
price of oil is currently at its all time high. Environmental lobbies
are getting stronger than ever, and it will continue to become even
stronger as the world natural resources continue to deplete. Many
traditional airlines are facing great difficulties because of high fuel
costs, pilot unions who demand higher pay, intensive competition from
low cost carriers, etc. Many
airlines are now imposing fuel surcharge on commuters. Insurance
of aircrafts is also much more expensive than marine crafts.
Smugglers
and pirates are becoming more sophisticated, and many now own high
speed boats, in some cases even equipped with small armament. For a
country like Australia that has a very long coastline, coastal patrol
is a difficult and expensive task. Illegal migrants arriving by boats
are on the increase.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright
Wigetworks Pte Ltd. All Rights Reserved
123 Genting Lane #05-04
Yenom Industrial
Building Singapore 349574
|
|









|
|